مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب

تحاليل وتنقية ومعالجة المياه
 
الرئيسيةالبوابةمكتبة الصورس .و .جبحـثالأعضاءالمجموعاتالتسجيلدخول
تنظيف وتطهير وغسيل واعادة تاهيل الخزانات


معمل تكنولاب البهاء جروب
 للتحاليل الكيميائية والطبية
والتشخيص بالنظائر المشعة
 للمخدرات والهرمونات والسموم
 وتحاليل المياه

مجموعة
تكنولاب البهاء جروب
لتصميم محطات الصرف الصناعى والصحى
لمعالجة مياه الصرف الصناعى والصحى
مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب
المكتب الاستشارى العلمى
دراسات علمية كيميائية



معالجة الغلايات وانظمة البخار المكثف
معالجة ابراج التبريد المفتوحة
معالجة الشيللرات
مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب
اسنشاريين
كيميائيين/طبيين/بكترولوجيين
عقيد دكتور
بهاء بدر الدين محمود
رئيس مجلس الادارة
استشاريون متخصصون فى مجال تحاليل وتنقية ومعالجة المياه
متخصصون فى تصنيع وتصميم كيماويات
معالجة الصرف الصناعى والصحى
حسب كل مشكلة كل على حدة
تصنيع وتحضير كيماويات معالجة المياه الصناعية
مؤتمرات/اجتماعات/محاضرات/فريق عمل متميز
صور من وحدات معالجة المياه


technolab el-bahaa group
TECHNOLAB EL-BAHAA GROUP
EGYPT
FOR
WATER
TREATMENT/PURIFICATION/ANALYSIS
CONSULTANTS
CHEMIST/PHYSICS/MICROBIOLIGIST
 
INDUSTRIAL WATER
WASTE WATER
DRINKING WATER
TANKS CLEANING
 
CHAIRMAN
COLONEL.DR
BAHAA BADR EL-DIN
0117156569
0129834104
0163793775
0174041455

 

 

 

تصميم وانشاء محطات صرف صناعى/waste water treatment plant design

technolab el-bahaa group
egypt
We are a consultants in water treatment with our chemicals as:-
Boiler water treatment chemicals
Condensated steam treatment chemicals
Oxygen scavenger treatment chemicals
Ph-adjustment treatment chemicals
Antiscale treatment chemicals
Anticorrosion treatment chemicals
Open cooling tower treatment chemicals
Chillers treatment chemicals
Waste water treatment chemicals
Drinking water purification chemicals
Swimming pool treatment chemicals
Fuel oil improver(mazote/solar/benzene)
technolab el-bahaa group
egypt
We are consultants in extraction ,analysis and trading the raw materials of mines as:-
Rock phosphate
32%-30%-28%-25%
Kaolin
Quartez-silica
Talcum
Feldspae(potash-sodumic)
Silica sand
Silica fume
Iron oxid ore
Manganese oxid
Cement(42.5%-32.5%)
Ferro manganese
Ferro manganese high carbon

 

water treatment unit design


 

وكلاء لشركات تركية وصينية لتوريد وتركيب وصيانة الغلايات وملحقاتها
solo agent for turkish and chinese companies for boiler production/manufacture/maintance

 

وكلاء لشركات تركية وصينية واوروبية لتصنيع وتركيب وصيانة ابراج التبريد المفتوحة

 

تصميم وتوريد وتركيب الشيللرات
design/production/maintance
chillers
ابراج التبريد المفتوحة
مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب
المكتب الاستشارى العلمى
قطاع توريد خطوط انتاج المصانع
 
نحن طريقك لاختيار افضل خطوط الانتاج لمصنعكم
سابقة خبرتنا فى اختيار خطوط الانتاج لعملاؤنا
 
1)خطوط انتاج العصائر الطبيعية والمحفوظة والمربات
2)خطوط انتاج الزيوت الطبيعية والمحفوظة
3)خطوط انتاج اللبن الطبيعى والمحفوظ والمبستر والمجفف والبودرة
4)خطوط تعليب وتغليف الفاكهة والخضروات
5)خطوط انتاج المواسير البلاستيك والبى فى سى والبولى ايثيلين
6)خطوط انتاج التراى كالسيوم فوسفات والحبر الاسود
7)خطوط انتاج الاسفلت بانواعه
Coolمحطات معالجة الصرف الصناعى والصحى بالطرق البيولوجية والكيميائية
9)محطات معالجة وتنقية مياه الشرب
10)محطات ازالة ملوحة البحار لاستخدامها فى الشرب والرى
11)الغلايات وخطوط انتاج البخار الساخن المكثف
12)الشيللرات وابراج التبريد المفتوحة وخطوط انتاج البخار البارد المكثف
 
للاستعلام
مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب
0117156569
0129834104
0163793775
 
القاهرة-شارع صلاح سالم-عمارات العبور-عمارة 17 ب
فلا تر رملية/كربونية/زلطيه/حديدية

وحدات سوفتنر لازالة عسر المياه

مواصفات مياه الشرب
Drinking water
acceptable
values

50

colour

acceptable

Taste

nil

Odour

6.5-9.2

ph

 

1 mg/dl

pb

5 mg/dl

as

50 mg/dl

cn

10 mg/dl

cd

0-100mg/dl

hg

8 mg/dl

f

45 mg/dl

N02

1 mg/dl

Fe

5 mg/dl

Mn

5.1 mg/dl

Cu

200 mg/dl

Ca

150 mg/dl

Mg

600 mg/dl

Cl

400 mg/dl

S04

200 mg/dl

Phenol

15 mg/dl

zn

 

 

الحدود المسموح به
ا لملوثات الصرف الصناعى
 بعد المعالجة
Acceptable
values
treated wate water
7-9.5

ph

25-37 c

Temp

40 mg/dl

Suspended solid

35 mg/dl

bod

3 mg/dl

Oil & grase

0.1 mg/dl

hg

0.02 mg/dl

cd

0.1 mg/dl

cn

0.5mg/dl

phenol

1.5 ds/m

conductivity

200 mg/dl

na

120 mg/dl

ca

56 mg/dl

mg

30 mg/dl

k

200 mg/dl

cl

150 mg/dl

S02

0.75 mg/dl

Fe

0.2 mg/dl

Zn

0.5 mg/dl

Cu

0.03 mg/dl

Ni

0.09 mg/dl

Cr

0.53 mg/dl

لb

0.15 mg/dl

pb

 





pipe flocculator+daf
plug flow flocculator
lamella settels

محطات تحلية مياه البحر بطريقة التقطير الومضى على مراحل
MSF+3.jpg (image)
محطات التقطير الومضى لتحلية مياه البحر2[MSF+3.jpg]
some of types of tanks we services
انواع الخزانات التى يتم تنظيفها
ASME Specification Tanks
Fuel Tanks
Storage Tanks
Custom Tanks
Plastic Tanks
Tank Cleaning Equipment
Double Wall Tanks
Septic Tanks
Water Storage Tanks
Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Tanks
Stainless Steel Tanks
Custom / Septic
مراحل المعالجة الاولية والثانوية والمتقدمة للصرف الصناعى

صور مختلفة
من وحدات وخزانات معالجة الصرف الصناعى
 التى تم تصميمها وتركيبها من قبل المجموعة

صور
 من خزانات الترسيب الكيميائى والفيزيائى
 لوحدات معالجة الصرف الصناعى
المصممة من قبل المحموعة



technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group

technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group


technolab el-bahaa group




مياه رادياتير اخضر اللون
بريستول تو ايه
انتاج شركة بريستول تو ايه - دمياط الجديدة
مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب

اسطمبات عبوات منتجات شركة بريستول تو ايه-دمياط الجديدة

مياه رادياتير خضراء فوسفورية

من انتاج شركة بريستول تو ايه 

بترخيص من مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب


زيت فرامل وباكم

DOT3



شاطر | 
 

 تنظيف الخزانات البترولية ورفع المخلفات منها بالطرق الكيميائية والحرارية

استعرض الموضوع السابق استعرض الموضوع التالي اذهب الى الأسفل 
كاتب الموضوعرسالة
Admin
Admin
avatar

عدد المساهمات : 3513
تاريخ التسجيل : 15/09/2009
العمر : 49
الموقع : مصر

مُساهمةموضوع: تنظيف الخزانات البترولية ورفع المخلفات منها بالطرق الكيميائية والحرارية   الخميس أبريل 24, 2014 12:53 pm

Method of cleaning large storage tanks for petroleum products


In a process for cleaning petroleum deposits from storage tanks, including tanker cargo holds which may be of 1,000 to 2,000 ton and higher cargo
capacity, involving the steps of applying a liquid chemical cleaning material to inner tank surfaces, allowing a residence time for opti mum action of
such cleaning material, and then washing with water to remove chemical and dislodged deposits from tank surfaces; 


the improvement for providing uniform application of cleaning material to all inner tank surfaces including inaccessible surfaces of structural and 
support members, that comprises generating a dispersion of said cleaning material within said tank in the form of a wet fog having a particle size 
predominantly in the to 40 micron range.


As long as crude oil and oil products have been stored and transported, there has been a nagging problem of how to clean out storage tanks and
bunkers to permit the carrying of other products without objectionable contamination. 


As long as the same cargo such as crude oil or residual fuel
oil is to be carried in a particular hold or storage tank, the need for cleaning may not arise except for the conventional washing with water to free 
the space of gas fumes. Substantial layers of deposit on the tank walls formed by carrying a particular cargo such as crude oils will not particularly 
contaminate additional cargoes of crude oil. 


On the other hand, even small amounts of such deposits will contaminate subsequent cargoes of higher grade, such for example, as distillate oil, 
kerosene, gasoline, or the like. 


In fact, one method of upgrading a tank or tanker in the past has been to shift to progressively higher grade cargoes contaminating each with a 
small amount of residue left by the prior cargo. Such a process, however, may require many months to achieve the desired upgrading.
 
Furthermore, it is often difiicult to follow this procedure because of unavailability of the particular type cargoes needed in various stages of the 
upgrading.


Even so, it has sometimes been the practice to travel substantial distances without cargo in order to carry cargoes of the grade for 
which the tank is suitable or of the grade needed in the upgrading process.
Various methods have been used in the past to effect rapid cleaning of tanks, but all have been extremely cOStly in materials employed and/ or in 
time and hours of manual labor involved.


It has sometimes been the practice, for example, to use light oils or kerosene type fractions to wash the 
bulk of sludge and oil deposits from tank surfaces, but this may require the use of the lighter fraction in a proportion of about 10 to percent of the 
total volume of a tank, and obviously becomes prohibitive unless the resulting mixture can be returned to the refinery and reprocessed.


Another procedure has been to have men enter the tanks and manually scrape deposit from the inner tank surfaces, expensive, due to the man 
hours involved in cleaning each but this is unpleasant, tedious, and hazardous, as well as tank.


Furthermore, after scraping away the bulk of the 
deposits, it is still necessary to remove the residue with 3,436,263 Patented Apr. 1, 1969 lighter fractions, such as kerosene, or with suitable 
chemicals if a really clean tank is desired.


The problems involved are large-scale problems when it is realized that individual tanks to be cleaned may have a capacity of 2,000 tons or more of 
oil products.


A typical cargo tank might measure, for example, 30 feet by 30 feet and have a height of 40 feet.


Furthermore, while large surfaces 
may be relatively smooth and accessible, there are inevitably inwardly extending reinforcing members, frequently with overhanging portions which 
provide inaccessible surfaces which are extremely difiicult to clean.


In conventional cleaning operations, extensive use is made of Butterworth (trademark) tank cleaning apparatus or similar mechanical tank washing 
apparatus for hot and cold water washing of tanks.


Such apparatus involves a number of movable high-pressure water jets which in an extended 
period of operation at different levels in a tank, can contact most surfaces to physically erode loose deposits and work them to the bottom.
 
From the tank bottom, the water and dislodged oil deposits are pumped to a slop tank from which, after Stratification, the water layer can be 
pumped back to the sea. 


The oil residues, however, are extremely hydrophobic, and when attempting to clean a tank containing, for example, 
residual fuel oil, it is not uncommon even after extensive mechanical washing with hot water to find deposits remaining which are A to inch, and 
sometimes as much as one inch in thickness.
 
Furthermore, inaccessible areas which cannot be reached by such apparatus may retain still heavier deposits. Thus, even after extensive 
mechanical washing, there may be several barrels of sludge or oil deposits adhering to the walls and bottom of a single tank. On a ship which may 
have 25 to 30 or more cargo tanks, therefore, a thorough cleaning of all tanks may involve the removal of one hundred barrels or more of deposits 
from the tanks.


It has now been discovered in accordance with the present invention that it is possible by applying certain chemicals to troublesome oil and sludge 
deposits, under conditions which will assure a substantially uniform contact of controlled duration with such deposits, to so soften and react upon 
the deposits that they can not only be dislodged by streams of water, as by hosing or mechanical washing, but are at the same time converted to 
an oil-in-water emulsion which can be easily removed from the tank being cleaned. Furthermore, the resulting emulsion is of such a nature, that 
either directly, or with a minimum of further treatment, it can be discharged into the ocean without any objectionable separation of oil 
agglomerates.


The chemical to be employed in the new method is a type previously used for the cleaning of machinery, the cleaning up of oil spillages on floors 
and the like, and similar marine and industrial housekeeping in areas which tend to become contaminated with petroleum products and sludge.


 It comprises a mixture of a highly aromatic petroleum fraction, and a completely miscible emulsifying agent which is capable of producing 
oil-in-water emulsions. Particularly effective as emulsifying agents are the liquid nonionic surfactants.


Preferably, the aromatic fraction should be 
a mixed methyl-naphthalene type fraction (including mono-, diand poly-methyl-naphthalene) boiling within the range 350'700 F., and having 
a flash point above 150 F. 


The composition should contain about to 94% by volume of aromatic fraction and 6 to 20% by volume of emulsifying agent.


Within this range 
the preferred amount of emulsifying agent will depend upon the nature of the cleaning operation and the intended manner of disposal of collected
 residues.


Thus, while compositions containing to 94% by volume of aromatic fraction, and 6 to 10% by volume of emulsifying agent are generally
 preferred, somewhat greater proportions of emulsifying agent may sometimes be desirable to provide complete emulsification of the petroleum 
residues.


The emulsifying agents for use in the cleaning compositions can be selected from a wide variety of commercially available surfactants which form 
oil-in-Water emulsions and are miscible with the aromatic petroleum fractions.


 Suitable nonionic surfactants include those in which hydrophobic 
moieties are condensed with a lower alkylene oxide to form hydrophilic oxyalkylene chains.


Hydrophobic moieties can be provided by fatty 
alcohols, alkyl phenols, such as nonyl phenol, octyl phenol, and the like, by polypropylene glycols, and other relatively high molecular weight 
compounds having free hydroxyl groups.


As is well known in the surfactant art, condensing such an alcoholic compound with a lower 
alkylene oxide, such as ethylene oxide, has a solubilizing effect which increases with the length of the ethylene oxide chain; but also has a viscosity
 increasing effect as the molecular weight of the resulting condensates is increased, with the higher molecular weight condensates becoming 
pastes, or even solids.


For use in the present compositions, those surfactants should be selected which are liquid and highly water soluble, 
as well as being miscible with the petroleum fractions.


A preferred aromatic fraction for use in the cleaning composition is a mixed methylnaphthalene fraction having a boiling range of about 
400 to 550 F.; and with this methylnaphthalene fraction preferred surfactants include octyl phenol and nonyl phenol ethylene oxide condensates 
containing about 9 to 10 mols ethylene oxide per mol of alkyl phenol.


Such a composition is a transparent liquid of very low viscosity, and 
generally light amber in color, and has a flash point in excess of 175 F.


In carrying out the new method, the chemical, or cleaning composition above described, is applied as uniformly as possible to all oil and sludge 
coated surfaces in an enclosure at the rate of about 50 to 80 gallons per thousand tons of tank capacity.


Within this range, selection of the 
optimum amount will depend generally on the nature and thickness of deposits to be removed, and the amount of additional surface Within the 
tank by reason of beams, bays, and other braces protruding from the walls.


The dosage of chemical can also be expressed as about to 9 gallons per
thousand square feet of surface to be cleaned. In practice, however, it is more practical to relate the dosage to the tank capacity, since this figure 
will be readily available to operating personnel.


The application of chemical to contaminated tank surfaces can be accomplished by an operating team of 2 or 3 men entering the tank with hoses 
and spraying all surfaces as uniformly as possible.


This method of application permits complete wetting and coating of deposits in inaccessible 
placesbehind beams and bulkheads, and the like but is subject to variation in the care exerted by the workmen in reaching all areas.


Careful hand 
spraying of chemical on inner contaminated surfaces of a tank having a capacity of 800 to 1,000 tons can be accomplished within a period of about 
one hour to one and one-half hours.


Following the application of chemical to the contaminated tank surfaces, the tank is allowed to stand to permit a 2 to 6 hour, and preferably 
a 2 to 4 hour, residence time of the chemical on the tank deposits.


During this period the chemical has a chance to thoroughly penetrate 
the deposit reacting upon and softening even the caked sludge formed in repeated carrying of cargoes, such as residual fuel oil.


At the end of the 2 to 6 hour residence period, washing the treated tank with either heated or unheated sea water dislodges virtually all of 
the softened deposits, leaving the walls substantially free of any petroleum residue.


The washing can be done with hand hoses, requiring 
a workcrew of 2 to 3 men, or can be done with mechanical washing equipment, the operation in either instance requiring about 1 hours for 
a 1,000 ton tank.


This removal of the deposits progresses in three ways. 
The jets of water from the hoses or mechanical washing apparatus may physically loosen large chunks of softened deposit, permitting them 
to fall to the bottom of the tank.


Adhering films and deposits are eroded and emulsified in the moving films of water.


At the same time, 
under the action of the emulsifying agent and the agitation of water as it is being pumped from the bottom of the tank, the semi-solid deposits 
which may fall to the bottom of the tank are broken up and dispersed in the water.


When washing is done by mechanical washing, it is preferable, 
after the mechanical washing to have a man enter the tank with a hand hose to rinse inaccessible areas which may not have been reached by 
the mechanical washing apparatus, and to aid in the removal of semi-solid residue which may not have been completely dispersed before the water emulsion is pumped from the tank.


In this final clean-up operation there is also occasionally solid residue, such as rust flakes which have been dislodged from the walls, and which should be collected and removed in providing a thoroughly clean tank.


The residence time of 2 to 6 hours, and preferably 2 to 4 hours, should be adhered to for optimum results with the new method, 
as the subsequent rinsing or washing operation tends to be prolonged with a longer residence period.


Tanks have been found to rinse clean, 
however, even when washing is done two or three days after the cleaning material has been applied.


The procedure as above described permits tanks to be cleaned much more thoroughly and in a small fraction of the time required by 
previous methods.


Furthermore, it requires substantially less manpower than previous methods, although the step of hand spraying chemical 
on the inner tank surfaces remains a rather unpleasant operation.


Most important, however, is the fact that the new cleaning method makes 
possible for the first time in an economically practical way the upgrading of a tanker from crude or residual oil cargo to clear cargoes (gasoline, etc.) in a single brief cleaning operation.


A prefered adaptation of the new tank cleaning method which further reduces cleaning time and costs while eliminating this unpleasant operation 
of hand application of cleaning material, and the chances of human error in the hand application, involves the generation within the tank of 
a dispersion of cleaning material in the form of a wet fog.


In spraying terminology, the term wet fog is used to designate a particle size of about 
10 to 40 microns.


This compares, for example, to a dry fog having a particle size of about 2 to 5 microns, and a misty rain having a particle size of 
about 50 to microns.


For the purpose of the present invention, the particle size of the sprayed material can be within the range of about 5 to 
50 microns, provided that the bulk of the material is in the wet fog range of 10 to 40 microns.


To better visualize the significance of particle size, 
attention is directed to the following tabulation:
Within a confined area such as an oil storage tank, it will be apparent from the slow rate of particle fall, and the distance which particles can travel
 in a mildly agitated system (such as a 3 mph wind) that dispersed particles of cleaning material will have ample opportunity to impinge and settle
 upon all inner tank surfaces, including surfaces behind beams and bulkheads which are normally considered inaccessible.


Furthermore, 
in the confines of a tank in which the total exposed surface area is only a small fraction of an acre, the number of particles per square inch 
impinging upon the surfaces will be many times the numbers indicated in the above tabulation.


Furthermore, when it is realized that the cleaning 
material is applied at the rate of about 50 to 80 gallons per thousand tons of tank capacity, it will be apparent that the spraying of a wet fog will
 distribute the cleaning material as a continuous film of appreciable thickness on all inner tank surfaces.


It should be noted in this connection, 
that the cleaning material penetrates rapidly into oil and sludge deposits, thereby minimizing accumulation at the surface of the deposits and
 runoff of the impinging cleaning material.


The generation of a wet fog of the type suitable for use in the present method can be accomplished with commercially available spray equipment, 
preferably involving the use of pneumatic atomizing nozzles providing a wide and dense spray pattern, to which cleaning agent and atomizing air 
feed at separately and properly controlled pressures to give the desired particle size distribution.


Suitable nozzles can be obtained from various 
suppliers, but particularly good results have been obtained wtih Spray Setup No. 29, produced by Spraying Systems Company of Bellwood,
 Ill., and utilizing their fluid nozzle No. 60100 and air nozzle No. 1406-52-70, which provides a wide angle round spray pattern.


It is preferable to 
use a number of these nozzles collectively both to multiply the directions in which the spray is initially aimed, and to provide the capacity desired 
for discharge of cleaning material at a practical rate.


A preferred apparatus has been an elongated unit with a cluster of nozzles at each end which 
may be passed through the openings for mechanical washing apparatus, standard on most oil tankers, and the like, and which can then be 
suspended at different heights within a tank from its midpoint.


A unit approximately 6 feet long with a total of nozzles, 4 angularly disposed, 
and 1 axially disposed at each end of the unit have been found to provide excellent spray distribution, and a practical feed rate at the desired 
operating pressures, permitting discharge of a 1% to 2 times as much cleaning material as previously indicated.


Following the wet fog spray application of cleaning material, the rinsing or washing operation is carried out in the manner previously described
 after a residence time of the cleaning material of about 2 to 6 hours, and preferably 2 to 4 hours.


Whether the washing is done by means of hand 
hoses, or by mechanical washing apparatus, the cleaning results are excellent, generally surpassing to some extent, the results obtained when the 
cleaning material is applied by hand.


This is understandable, since the wet fog application of cleaning material provides a uniformity of contact
 with contaminated surfaces which is difiicult to achieve with hand application.



[img][/img]
الرجوع الى أعلى الصفحة اذهب الى الأسفل
معاينة صفحة البيانات الشخصي للعضو http://technolabelbahaagp.googoolz.com
 
تنظيف الخزانات البترولية ورفع المخلفات منها بالطرق الكيميائية والحرارية
استعرض الموضوع السابق استعرض الموضوع التالي الرجوع الى أعلى الصفحة 
صفحة 1 من اصل 1

صلاحيات هذا المنتدى:لاتستطيع الرد على المواضيع في هذا المنتدى
مجموعة تكنولاب البهاء جروب :: قسم معالجة وتنقية وتحاليل المياه :: المكتب الاستشارى العلمى-
انتقل الى: